Local control and parental involvement make good schools – InsideSources
On one level, Attorney General Merrick Garland can be excused for ignoring two of the most important influences in determining which schools are successful. However, teachers in all schools should feel embarrassed for members of the National School Boards Association or for any member of the local school board who is unaware that local control and parental involvement are major factors in the creation. good schools.
For nearly a decade after the 1980s call for public school reform (“A Nation in Peril”), two Brookings Institute researchers examined robust surveys of high school students, teachers and administrators to help answer a major question: What makes schools effective and efficient? In their 1990 Politics book, âMarkets & America’s Schools,â John Chubb and Terry Moe concluded that the variables that make good schools are those that allow for a high level of parental involvement, support innovative school leaders, competition and parental choice in school.
Muzzling parents who question what their children are taught runs counter to the results of educational research on what makes good schools and goes against the country’s tradition of local control over education. public. Garland’s directive to FBI agents and a list of other federal entities on parents expressing concern about what is taught at their tax-funded school is a major abuse of government power.
Since its inception, public education has been managed locally, that is, by districts, with less power as one moves to state and federal levels. Education policy is the prime example of genuine federalism. Local school district leaders and, where applicable, state education officials have not hesitated to thumb their noses at federal policies and programs. For example, the main federal initiative, “No Child Left Behind,” had little success as local and state school officials paid little attention to what politicians in Washington DC believed could improve public education.
Residents and local officials should ask themselves what could piss off parents to the point where they are speaking out in unprecedented numbers at school meetings. The justice ministry’s memo to the local police ignores the rights of citizens to assemble, petition the government, and freedom of speech.
School board meetings are mostly uneventful; few inhabitants show up to speak. The increase in school taxes can attract a lively crowd; but what is it when school board officials think they need the support of the police to keep order? Taxpayers should go to these meetings to find out.
Politicians, teachers and experts who argue that citizens should not question school curricula because they are not subject matter experts should take a civic education course and learn about the historical foundations and philosophies of public education in this country.
Horace Mann, recognized as the founder of public education in the United States, made it one of his goals to train students who would participate in “informed public opinion.” As today, the goal of âcommon schoolsâ was to train law-abiding and productive citizens for the betterment of society.
The three Rs help build industry habits and student mind habits. However, the habits of the heart and soul should come mainly from the home; no institution should take on this role or try to indoctrinate students with questionable content.
In fact, when the public school movements were founded in the United States, the dominant elite were Protestants, and these influential people wanted to make sure that Catholic children, mostly immigrants, got a proper spiritual education, so a hidden program. Catholic families were suspicious of the public school system, vestiges of which exist today.
In fact, the list of the best schools in the county identified by Chubb and Moe in their study were schools sponsored by religion because they exercised local control and saw education as a partnership between teachers and parents.
A significant number of parents consider what schools teach their children today to be irrelevant. For them, modern indoctrination does not match their understanding of truth, justice, and the American way. Parents, at least, deserve respect and the right to be called upon to question what educators teach their children. The federal government does not have the power to ring a bell to fire parents who care about what is taught in public schools today.